Digital transformation is becoming unavoidable in every corner of financial services. Even wealth management, historically slower to embrace digitalization, is now under pressure to adopt emerging technologies and increase its digital capabilities.
Despite the urgency, experience suggests that the majority is struggling with digital transformation. Research by McKinsey & Company shows that 70% of such projects fail, highlighting a gap between ambition and execution. This is no surprise, considering the complexity and disruption that a transformation is bound to bring. After all, true transformation requires meaningful change and that never comes easily.
While digital transformation has so far proven to be complex and prone to failure for wealth managers, ignoring it is no longer an option these days. Various factors are reshaping the industry, making digitalization not just an option, but increasingly, a necessity.
These factors include operational pressures, increasing competitive pressure from challengers, evolving client expectations, and rapid technological advancements. Here’s how these factors are putting on pressure on wealth managers to act:
As mentioned before, around 70% of digital transformation projects in the financial sector tend to fail. Clearly something is going wrong, right? In fact, a lot of things could go wrong: a comprehensive transformation has many tumblers and messing up one or two of these can already derail the whole project.
Thus, it is worth examining the available literature on what tends to go wrong with transformations before getting started. In the following, we will use three simple categories to sort common mistakes into: technology, people, and strategy.
The last decade in the financial sector was full of high-profile transformation projects, with many of them earning outsized attention due to their ultimate lack of success.
Not getting it right the first time is not the end of the world. The key question to determine whether a given institution can innovate effectively in the long-term is whether they have the intention and capability to decipher what went wrong previously and actively utilize those insights the next time they try. Here are a few institutions that have been refreshingly open about the causes behind failed transformation efforts.
After acquiring Postbank in 2010, it spent over a decade and billions of euros attempting to integrate the two institutions’ infrastructures. The replacement of a particular IT system was delayed by 13 years in the process due to unforeseen complications with regulatory requirements. Ignoring the worries raised by employees and a perceived lack of thorough due diligence before the acquisition also contributed to the costly misstep.
In its push to innovate, ANZ launched two separate mobile apps — one for everyday banking and another for wealth — only to find the split confused customers and hampered user experience. By prioritizing speed over strategic planning, ANZ became a rare example of a traditional bank trying to innovate too quickly. Eventually, the two apps were replaced by a single, unified platform that received significantly better reviews.
ASX set out to replace its settlement system entirely with blockchain. The project failed in part due to its overly ambitious scope – aiming for full replacement – and a cultural mismatch between the exchange and its fintech partner. Poor planning also plagued the effort, with repeated underestimations of resource intensity. To its credit, ASX was highly transparent, commissioning a detailed Accenture report that shed light on the project’s shortcomings.
So far, we have examined the factors that make digital transformation unavoidable and the reasons behind the low success rates of such projects. Now, it is time to throw our own hat in the ring and share some pieces of advice for any wealth manager that is looking to stay competitive and future-proof its operations.
We will return to the three key pillars of technology, people and strategy and offer insights from our 30+ years of operations, 80+ financial institutional clients and countless completed transformation projects.
We truly believe that by following these tips, your chances of success far exceed the average 30% in the industry. If you are interested in hearing more on this topic from us, keep watching this space as we will be sharing detailed case studies of Dorsum’s previous transformation projects at some of our largest clients.
Should you be interested in utilizing Dorsum’s experience and state-of-the-art solutions during your company’s transformation journey, reach out to us via any of our contact details. We would be glad to assist you in avoiding the pitfalls that cost millions to financial institutions worldwide.
Authors: Botond Bátorfi, Hannah Buckle